<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re-Branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betterthanblank.org/re-branding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betterthanblank.org/re-branding/</link>
	<description>Alex McLean&#039;s life &#38; thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://betterthanblank.org/re-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterthanblank.org/?p=309#comment-476</guid>
		<description>Alex, 

I think it looks cool, however, I think other churches have used the small plant leaves before...

With that being said though...  I don&#039;t remember the church that I saw using it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, </p>
<p>I think it looks cool, however, I think other churches have used the small plant leaves before&#8230;</p>
<p>With that being said though&#8230;  I don&#8217;t remember the church that I saw using it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Re-Branding II at better than blank</title>
		<link>http://betterthanblank.org/re-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Re-Branding II at better than blank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterthanblank.org/?p=309#comment-447</guid>
		<description>[...] appreciate all the comments on the Re-Branding post (if you haven&#8217;t seen that post, you might want to read through it first). I&#8217;m throwing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appreciate all the comments on the Re-Branding post (if you haven&#8217;t seen that post, you might want to read through it first). I&#8217;m throwing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Worship</title>
		<link>http://betterthanblank.org/re-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Worship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterthanblank.org/?p=309#comment-445</guid>
		<description>i think too animated...maybe try and redo the leaves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think too animated&#8230;maybe try and redo the leaves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://betterthanblank.org/re-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterthanblank.org/?p=309#comment-427</guid>
		<description>I love It!

It can translate to many mediums. How does it look in black and white? I&#039;d love to see it on white or black...the litmus of any logo is how it looks flat.

I love crosses and everything, but I prefer church logos sans the obligatory cross.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love It!</p>
<p>It can translate to many mediums. How does it look in black and white? I&#8217;d love to see it on white or black&#8230;the litmus of any logo is how it looks flat.</p>
<p>I love crosses and everything, but I prefer church logos sans the obligatory cross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesmclean</title>
		<link>http://betterthanblank.org/re-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesmclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterthanblank.org/?p=309#comment-423</guid>
		<description>I think it looks incredible. It is very wholesome and organic. It makes me want to go eat an orange. It does look a bit Disneylandish but who cares? Disneyland has done well for themselves. 
Very simple and professional. I also like how it is darker towards the bottom and lighter towards the top. Good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it looks incredible. It is very wholesome and organic. It makes me want to go eat an orange. It does look a bit Disneylandish but who cares? Disneyland has done well for themselves.<br />
Very simple and professional. I also like how it is darker towards the bottom and lighter towards the top. Good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby</title>
		<link>http://betterthanblank.org/re-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterthanblank.org/?p=309#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Well, honestly, I think I&#039;m just not a huge fan of those leaves.  The rest is cool.  I like the burnt orange and what not.  But with the leaves, it doesn&#039;t look nearly as current in my opinion.  It makes me think of a bit more conservative crowd than what I know you have there.

Maybe if the &quot;plant look&quot; were a little more rugged or textured.  Maybe using something similar to the floral pattern in the first one.  Just some thoughts.  But remember, I&#039;m not a graphic designer at all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, honestly, I think I&#8217;m just not a huge fan of those leaves.  The rest is cool.  I like the burnt orange and what not.  But with the leaves, it doesn&#8217;t look nearly as current in my opinion.  It makes me think of a bit more conservative crowd than what I know you have there.</p>
<p>Maybe if the &#8220;plant look&#8221; were a little more rugged or textured.  Maybe using something similar to the floral pattern in the first one.  Just some thoughts.  But remember, I&#8217;m not a graphic designer at all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

